The Huxleyan

Share this post
Assange Extradition Order May Be Signed After UK Supreme Court Denies Appeal
thehuxleyan.substack.com

Assange Extradition Order May Be Signed After UK Supreme Court Denies Appeal

In a blow to press freedoms, the case can now be sent from the Westminster Magistrates Court to UK Home Secretary Priti Patel in order to authorize the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

John Pongratz
Mar 15
3
Share this post
Assange Extradition Order May Be Signed After UK Supreme Court Denies Appeal
thehuxleyan.substack.com

Share

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled against allowing an appeal by Julian Assange's defense to be made before them, creating a scenario that could have the WikiLeaks founder extradited to the United States by the end of the year where he would be put on trial for 18 counts related to publishing confidential documents that could land him a sentence of 175 years in a high security prison.

At the end of January, Lord Chief Justice Ian Duncan Burnett opened a pathway for the Assange defense to appeal to the UK Supreme Court. It came just a little over a month after a High Court sided with a U.S. government appeal that overturned the January 2021 decision against extradition.

The Huxleyan
Appeals Set to Keep Going Back and Forth as Assange Remains Tangled in the Process
What is no doubt a win for the Assange defense in that it wards off an order of extradition for now, one still can't help wondering whether the permission to potentially appeal to the nation's highest court is just another hollow stop in the grueling process of making an example of Julian Assange…
Read more
6 months ago · 3 likes · John Pongratz

Though the Chief Justice did not allow the appeal himself, he certified one of the three points of law raised by the defense as a "matter of public importance," putting the decision on whether or not to grant the appeal in the hands of the Supreme Court.

That one point of law centered around the U.S. government appeals that were only offered after Judge Baraitser's January 2021 decision against extradition, and which are riddled with loopholes.

As Assange's attorneys wrote in their application for appeal, the fact that the "assurances were permitted to be introduced in this case for the first time on appeal totally undermines the primacy of the extradition hearing and deprives the defendant of an opportunity to test them and their implications before the district judge."

"It is generally regarded as unfair, wrong, and abusive for a party to elect—for a perceived or actual tactical advantage—to conduct litigation in one way and then, when met with an adverse judicial decision on that, to attempt to re-litigate or appeal on a new and different basis," the lawyers wrote.

Assange's defense has also long argued that the U.S. assurances that claim to mitigate the suicide risk Judge Baraitser cited assure very little. For instance, the assurances against the use of Special Administration Measures (known as SAMs, which subject a prisoner to surveillance and solitary confinement if deemed a risk) are completely conditional, meaning the U.S. can choose whether or not to implement the measures based on their own assessment. They've also made note that preventing SAMs does not prevent isolation because in many cases, prisoners in the U.S. suffer through solitary confinement for reasons not associated with SAMs.

Similarly, the assurance that Assange won't be held at ADX Florence is not the only high security prison in the country that could present ridiculously oppressive conditions.

In spite of these legitimately flimsy assurances, the UK Supreme Court denied the request for appeal. Now, the case can go from the Westminster Magistrates Court to the United Kingdom's Home Secretary Priti Patel in order to have an extradition order signed.

If Patel signs such an order, there is a chance the Assange defense can raise a new challenge to the Magistrates Court on issues pertaining to press freedoms that have not been presented before them, which would keep Julian Assange in the UK.

However, if the High Court and the Supreme Court both say that it fails to raise "arguable points of law," Assange could be extradited within the calendar year.

The dangers for press freedoms are mounting. . .

Twitter avatar for @johnpilgerJohn Pilger @johnpilger
The UK Supreme Court says the case of Julian #Assange fails to raise "an arguable point of law" and he can be extradited. This insults our intelligence and tells us there is no credible justice system. Julian Assange has committed no crime. Period.
Julian Assange denied permission to appeal against extraditionA Supreme Court spokesman says the Wikileaks founder failed to raise “an arguable point of law”.bbc.com

March 14th 2022

566 Retweets1,091 Likes
Twitter avatar for @SarcasmStardustComrade Misty is Putin’s Buddy 🍀 @SarcasmStardust
Starting tomorrow we are focusing our energy on @UKHomeSecretary @ukhomeoffice @pritipatel PLEASE help us. The time to get active is now. #FreeAssangeNOW
Image

March 15th 2022

39 Retweets56 Likes

. . . and the need for public pressure has never been greater.

Leave a comment

Follow Us on Twitter

Read null in the new Substack app
Now available for iOS

Related Reading:

The Huxleyan
Hope for Collective Action: $53 Million Raised For Assange Legal Defense Through DAO
An online collective rallied behind Julian Assange in support of press freedoms to purchase an NFT that will provide the Assange legal defense fund with over $50 million at a time when the need for public pressure is absolutely essential. In December, the U.S. government…
Read more
5 months ago · 4 likes · John Pongratz

While The Huxleyan intends to remain free to the public, there are paid subscription offers (which would be more of a donation than receiving access to anything in particular) at $5/month, or $45/year. As always, donations are welcome and appreciated via Venmo (@john-pongratz). Again, as those are just options, everything remains free. Thank you for reading and be sure to subscribe, comment, and share!

Twitter avatar for @thehuxleyanThe Huxleyan @thehuxleyan
You are always welcome to submit opinion pieces/columns/stories/etc. for consideration. Email thehuxleyan@gmail.com, with your piece pasted in the body plus any sources. Include your name and a brief 1-2 sentence bio. Try to keep it between 300-1200 words. Best, The Huxleyan

September 9th 2020

6 Likes
Share this post
Assange Extradition Order May Be Signed After UK Supreme Court Denies Appeal
thehuxleyan.substack.com
Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 The Huxleyan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing